When I was a young aspiring player, I often lost tennis matches by being too adventurous, which is my attempt to avoid admitting I was very impatient. I enjoyed playing the front court as much or more than staying near the baseline, and I never saw a short ball I did not want to attack.
Even by the age of twelve I would try and dominate my opponents with strong shots, or I would even serve and volley. Naturally, a game style with this risk profile produces plenty or errors. (In addition to an occasional spectacular play). After lost matches coaches would always tell me the number of unforced errors I had made. I never knew what to do with this information. (It’s not like it was my intention.)
“You made 41 unforced errors today!” a coach would say.
“What does that even mean,” I would respond rebelliously. “You’re just going for too much.”
I struggled with this feedback. How can I learn from this? In hindsight, I wish the coach would have helped me with situational play. When did the errors occur? How long were the rallies before I missed? When may I give myself permission to attack and when is patience more prudent. Certainly, an unforced error at the score of 40-0 is different from one produced at 30-40, don’t you agree?
Last week I was having a conversation with one of my adult clients about her most recent match. She mentioned that she had made too many unforced errors, and then she added a few more stats that she probably got from watching tennis on television. I told her that I was getting the gist of what she was saying, but I still could not get a good feel for the match as stats do not always paint the entire picture. I said that some stats are completely useless, and others can be counter intuitive.
“What ya talking ‘bout Willis?” (she did not actually say this) I continued by asking my Harvard- educated student the following question:
“After the match, what would yourather have the stat sheet say regarding break points, 2/3 or 4/17?”
She looked at me slightly confused (she suspected it was a set up): “I want to say 2/3, but it’s probably wrong, isn’t it?”
“Yes”, I continued. “Think about it, a 66.67 percent success rate (2/3) is indeed much better than a 23.5 percent (4/17), but in this case it is still better to break your opponent’s serve four times, instead of only two”.
She agreed to it being counter intuitive. I only mentioned that my client was Harvard-educated to show that intelligence was not in question here. I wasn’t teaching Penny, the waitress from the Cheesecake factory (no offense if you are a waitress, or don’t like The Big Bang Theory).
For some reason we look at all those break point opportunities and consider it a failure. What can we learn from this? The more opportunities we give ourselves, the better it is. A mindset of neutrality will be helpful here, an unattached approach to the outcome: if the break happens, great. If not, great.
Another stat in this realm is net points won/lost. When you look at a ratio of 4/9, you might judge it as a bad ratio. The player won four points at net, and she lost five points. What if I were to tell you that those four points won were all at break point! Then we might conclude that the nine attempts at net were not enough. If she had attacked the net twelve times for instance, she might not have needed those seventeen breakpoints! Your personal call to courage and to be brave at the right moments is a key strength for a competitor.
In any case, tennis stats are helpful, but have their limitations. Match play will still come down to being patient at the right times, being courageous at the right moments, and staying disciplined all match. Use the stats to dig into those areas more specifically. Answer the questions ‘when’ and ‘why”!
[Our Tennis Whisperer teaches the GHOST LINE strategy to answer the ‘when’ and ‘why’ questions — emphasis added]
Tonny van de Pieterman is a tennis professional at Point Set Indoor Racquet Club in Oceanside, NY. He has previously been named USTA Tennis Professional of the Year for the USTA/Eastern-Long Island Region.
https://longislandtennismagazine.com/tennis-numbers Tennis By The Numbers | Long Island Tennis Magazine
Plantar Fasciitis Is a Real Pain: symptoms, treatment and prevention | Tennis4Life
/in News, Tennis4Life /by RobTalking Shop with Coach Paul Annacone | ATP
/in Ask the Pro, News /by RobAUSTRALIAN Summer Tournament Schedule | TA
/in Club News, Goss /by Rob3-17 December 2022: December Showdown
Venue: Melbourne Park (Western Courts 5-17)
Category: Australian Junior National Championships
Week one
29 December 2022 – 8 January 2023: United Cup
Group Stages (29 December to 4 January): Pat Rafter Arena, Brisbane, Qld; RAC Arena, Perth, WA; Ken Rosewall Arena, Sydney, NSW
United Cup Final Four (6-8 January): Ken Rosewall Arena, Sydney, NSW
Category: ATP / WTA mixed team competition
Draw size: Six groups of three countries, 18 countries in total, up to eight players per country
1-8 January 2023: Adelaide International 1
Venue: The Drive, Adelaide, SA
Category: WTA 500 / ATP 250
Draw size: ATP and WTA – 32 singles, 24 doubles
31 December 2022 – 7 January 2023: Canberra International
Venue: Canberra Tennis Centre, Canberra, ACT
Category: ATP Challenger Tour / ITF W60
Draw size: ATP – 32 singles, 16 doubles; ITF – 32 singles, 16 doubles
Week two
9-14 January 2023: Adelaide International 2
Venue: The Drive, Adelaide, SA
Category: WTA 500 / ATP 250
Draw size: WTA – 32 singles, 16 doubles; ATP – 28 singles, 24 doubles
9-14 January 2023: Hobart International
Venue: Domain Tennis Centre, Hobart, TAS
Category: WTA 250
Draw size: 32 singles, 16 doubles
9-12 January 2023: Australian Open qualifying
Venue: Melbourne Park, Melbourne, Vic
Category: Grand Slam
Draw size: 128 men and women
10-14 January 2023: Victorian Wheelchair Open
Venue: Hume Tennis Centre, Melbourne, Vic
Category: ITF 1 Series
Draw size: 32 men’s singles, 24 women’s singles, 16 quad singles, 16 boys’ singles
13-18 January 2023: Traralgon Junior International
Venue: Traralgon Tennis Centre, Traralgon, Vic
Category: J1
Draw size: 64 singles, 32 doubles
Week three and four
16-29 January 2023: Australian Open
Venue: Melbourne Park, Melbourne, Vic
Category: Grand Slam
Draw size: 128 singles, 64 doubles
16-20 January 2023: Melbourne Wheelchair Open
Venue: Hume Tennis Centre, Melbourne
Category: ITF Super Series
Draw size: 32 men’s singles, 24 women’s singles, 24 quad singles, 16 boys’ singles
21-28 January 2023: AO Junior Championships
Venue: Melbourne Park, Melbourne
Category: Junior Grand Slam
Draw size: 64 singles, 32 doubles
24-28 January 2023: AO Wheelchair Championships
Venue: Melbourne Park, Melbourne
Category: Grand Slam
Draw size: 16 men’s singles, 16 women’s singles, 8 quad singles
Week five
30 January–13 February 2023: Burnie International 1 & 2
Venue: Burnie Tennis Club, Burnie, Tasmania
Category: Week 1 – ATP Challenger / ITF W60, week 2 – ITF 25
Draw size: ATP – 32 singles, 16 doubles; ITF – 32 singles, 16 doubles
New Recreation Centre at North Manly
/in Club News, Goss /by RobWarringah Recreation Centre is set to be rebuilt providing a welcoming, inclusive, fit-for-purpose space that gives women and girls equal opportunity to participate in squash and tennis following a steep increase in these sports.
Council has been successful in receiving over $3 million in funding from the State Government to rebuild the Warringah Recreation Centre. Council is also committing funds to the project which will see almost $5 million invested into the project.
Fit-for-purpose infrastructure is vital to increase the number of people participating in sport and investment into the new facility will help cater for the growing interest in both squash and tennis across NSW.
The upgraded Warringah Recreation Centre will provide opportunities for people of all ages, genders, abilities, physical capabilities, cultural and socio-economic background to take part in sport.
In 2020, the Recreation Centre had over 54,000 visits for tennis or 9,037 per court which is well above the Sydney average of 2,977 and 4,653 visits per court per annum average on the Northern Beaches.
According to Squash NSW, women and girls’ usage of this facility is expected to grow 40% while Tennis NSW data suggests that female participation in the sport is already at 40% and rising.
The concept plan for the new facility envisages five dedicated tennis courts and a minimum of three indoor squash courts both with spectator seating, accessible public amenities, changerooms, community storage, as well as floodlights, footpaths, bike racks and landscaping.
The project will provide a best practice example in NSW of a modern facility that attracts new users, increases participation and delivers physical and mental health benefits.
Construction is expected to commence by July 2023 with construction completed by 31 December 2025.
The project is made possible thanks to the NSW Government’s Multi-Sport Community Facility Fund.
Christmas Chorals
/in News /by RobThu 1 Dec, 6.30 – 8.30pm
Manly Oval
A family fun sing-a-long and a visit from the big man himself.
Learn more
Christmas by the Beach
Fri 9 Dec, 4 – 7.30pm
James Meehan Reserve, Dee Why
Carols, a children’s show, face painting, and photos with Santa.
Learn more
BADGE LEAGUE 2023 FACTSHEETS (Thursday & Saturday)
/in Badge /by Rob2023-BADGE-FACTSHEET-THURSDAY-LADIES.pdf
MLTC Newsletter – 30 Nov 2022
/in Club News /by RobChristmas Party this Saturday from 6.30pm. Lots of people have booked in for this event at the Clubhouse on Saturday, so it’s looking to be a fun night. Reminder if you are bringing a guest sign them in on arrival.
Best wishes,
Virginia
MLTC Secretary
www.manlylawn.com.au
58 men and 39 women earned at least $1 million in singles and doubles combined in 2022
/in Goss, News /by Enfold DemoTennis By The Numbers | AskThePro
/in Ask the Pro, News /by RobWhen I was a young aspiring player, I often lost tennis matches by being too adventurous, which is my attempt to avoid admitting I was very impatient. I enjoyed playing the front court as much or more than staying near the baseline, and I never saw a short ball I did not want to attack.
Even by the age of twelve I would try and dominate my opponents with strong shots, or I would even serve and volley. Naturally, a game style with this risk profile produces plenty or errors. (In addition to an occasional spectacular play). After lost matches coaches would always tell me the number of unforced errors I had made. I never knew what to do with this information. (It’s not like it was my intention.)
“You made 41 unforced errors today!” a coach would say.
“What does that even mean,” I would respond rebelliously. “You’re just going for too much.”
I struggled with this feedback. How can I learn from this? In hindsight, I wish the coach would have helped me with situational play. When did the errors occur? How long were the rallies before I missed? When may I give myself permission to attack and when is patience more prudent. Certainly, an unforced error at the score of 40-0 is different from one produced at 30-40, don’t you agree?
Last week I was having a conversation with one of my adult clients about her most recent match. She mentioned that she had made too many unforced errors, and then she added a few more stats that she probably got from watching tennis on television. I told her that I was getting the gist of what she was saying, but I still could not get a good feel for the match as stats do not always paint the entire picture. I said that some stats are completely useless, and others can be counter intuitive.
“What ya talking ‘bout Willis?” (she did not actually say this) I continued by asking my Harvard- educated student the following question:
“After the match, what would yourather have the stat sheet say regarding break points, 2/3 or 4/17?”
She looked at me slightly confused (she suspected it was a set up): “I want to say 2/3, but it’s probably wrong, isn’t it?”
“Yes”, I continued. “Think about it, a 66.67 percent success rate (2/3) is indeed much better than a 23.5 percent (4/17), but in this case it is still better to break your opponent’s serve four times, instead of only two”.
She agreed to it being counter intuitive. I only mentioned that my client was Harvard-educated to show that intelligence was not in question here. I wasn’t teaching Penny, the waitress from the Cheesecake factory (no offense if you are a waitress, or don’t like The Big Bang Theory).
For some reason we look at all those break point opportunities and consider it a failure. What can we learn from this? The more opportunities we give ourselves, the better it is. A mindset of neutrality will be helpful here, an unattached approach to the outcome: if the break happens, great. If not, great.
Another stat in this realm is net points won/lost. When you look at a ratio of 4/9, you might judge it as a bad ratio. The player won four points at net, and she lost five points. What if I were to tell you that those four points won were all at break point! Then we might conclude that the nine attempts at net were not enough. If she had attacked the net twelve times for instance, she might not have needed those seventeen breakpoints! Your personal call to courage and to be brave at the right moments is a key strength for a competitor.
In any case, tennis stats are helpful, but have their limitations. Match play will still come down to being patient at the right times, being courageous at the right moments, and staying disciplined all match. Use the stats to dig into those areas more specifically. Answer the questions ‘when’ and ‘why”!
[Our Tennis Whisperer teaches the GHOST LINE strategy to answer the ‘when’ and ‘why’ questions — emphasis added]
Tonny van de Pieterman is a tennis professional at Point Set Indoor Racquet Club in Oceanside, NY. He has previously been named USTA Tennis Professional of the Year for the USTA/Eastern-Long Island Region.
https://longislandtennismagazine.com/tennis-numbers Tennis By The Numbers | Long Island Tennis Magazine
MLTC Newsletter – 25 Nov 22
/in Club Championships, Club News /by RobThe Men’s A Grade Doubles final was completed in very windy conditions last Sunday. Tom Donald and Gavin McVean were successful 7-5 7-6 v Shishir Das and Stefan Fontes. A very close match so congrats to both pairs.
Eight pairs competed on Thursday for The Owen Kennedy Trophy. Owen was on hand himself to organise the tournament and present the trophy. Bill and Bruce won their pool easily as did Sally and Suellen in their pool. The younger and more glamorous pairing in Sally and Suellen won the final playoff 5-0 when time was called. Thanks to everyone who competed and enjoyed a few drinks afterwards. This is an annual event for midweek players and Owen assures us he will be around for many more years to organise his tournament.
Please see photos of the finalists from Sunday and Thursday below.
Christmas Party
We are looking forward to a fun night with 60 members and guests joining us for the Christmas Party next weekend – Sat 3rd Dec. Starts 6.30pm – one free drink on arrival for everyone who has bought a ticket. See you there!
Best wishes,
Denis Crowley
MLTC Club Captain
www.manlylawn.com.au
Netflix is About to Transform The Tennis World
/in Goss, News /by RobTechnique Is NOT The Answer | AskThePro
/in Ask the Pro, Whisperer /by RobOlivier eventually came to understand a vital truth: if technique execution is good during practice but significantly worse during matches you do NOT have a technique problem.
Technique is a fundamental element to tennis success, but becoming fixated on it can cause big drops in match performance!
Source: Jorge Capestany, USPTA